salah satu prinsip asuransi insurable interest adalah

F - Evidence can be biased, and often is.
For example, a report from a German Officer on a attack in WW2 may be different from his allied counterparts.

Answered by Tails | 2024-06-10

Based on the statement by Chris Hinton, historical sources often contain evidence that can be biased (F). This bias comes from the fact that individuals in the past often recorded events and created documents with specific purposes in mind, which may not align with the goal of providing an unbiased historical record. Such sources can include various types such as government documents, personal diaries, and newspapers, which were created to serve the interests or perspectives of those who produced them, not necessarily to facilitate the work of future historians.
To develop accurate historical narratives, historians must critically evaluate primary sources by considering the author, the audience, the intent, and the context in which these documents were created. Although a primary source is considered a direct gateway to the past, it can still present a narrow or skewed view, particularly if it only represents the lives of certain social groups, such as the elite. Sources from groups that were historically marginalized may be scarce, leading historians to seek out alternative records such as church records or court hearings to uncover the experiences of these individuals.
Ultimately, the utility of a historical source can vary greatly based on a historian's research question. Even biased or misleading material can be valuable, depending on how researchers use the source and what they aim to understand or demonstrate through their analysis. Therefore, interrogating sources for potential biases is a crucial aspect of the historical method and helps in constructing a more holistic understanding of the past.

Answered by MilenaMarkovna | 2024-06-18

Historical sources often contain evidence that can be biased due to the perspectives and intentions of their creators. It is crucial to acknowledge that these sources may not fully represent all points of view and are subject to selection bias. Thus, the correct answer to the question is A: Evidence that can be biased.
;

Answered by Tails | 2024-09-27

Jawaban:Penjelasan:Pihak yang mengasuransikan sesuatu harus memiliki kepentingan langsung dan sah atas objek yang diasuransikan.Penjelasan: Insurable interest berarti kamu hanya bisa mengasuransikan sesuatu jika kerusakannya atau kehilangannya akan menyebabkan kerugian secara langsung bagimu. Ini mencegah orang mengasuransikan barang atau jiwa orang lain yang tidak ada hubungan kepentingan secara hukum atau ekonomi.Contoh:Kamu bisa mengasuransikan rumahmu sendiri, karena kamu akan rugi jika rumah itu rusak.Kamu tidak bisa mengasuransikan rumah tetanggamu, karena kamu tidak punya kepentingan finansial langsung terhadap rumah itu.Seorang istri bisa mengasuransikan suami, karena ada hubungan ekonomi dan hukum.Kesimpulan: Prinsip insurable interest menjamin bahwa asuransi tidak digunakan sebagai alat spekulasi atau perjudian, melainkan sebagai perlindungan atas sesuatu yang memang bernilai bagi si tertanggung. Kalau kamu butuh semua prinsip dasar asuransi (seperti utmost good faith, indemnity, dll), aku bisa bantu juga!

Answered by rapshani | 2025-07-26