5/8 multiplied by 24 equals 15 because 15 is five eights of 24
The value of 5/8 x 24 in simplest form is; 15 .
The evaluation of expression respects the BODMAS concept.
BODMAS :
B = bracket ( )
O = of (×)
D = division (÷)
M = multiplication (×)
A = addition (+)
S = subtraction (-)
The evaluation of the expression given as;
=5/8 x 24 can be done as follows;
=5/8 × 24
Since 8 is a factor of 24 ; we can then have;
5 × 3
=15 .
Read more :
https://brainly.com/question/21979219
The value of 8 5 × 24 in simplest form is 15 . This is found by converting 24 into a fraction, multiplying, and then simplifying the result. The final answer is thus 15 .
;
Jawaban:The idea of a "government legalizing the mafia" is highly problematic and generally considered to be against the fundamental principles of a rule of law state. Here's why and what it could mean:What "Legalizing the Mafia" Implies: * Legitimizing Illicit Activities: It would mean the government formally sanctioning activities that are currently illegal and harmful, such as: * Extortion and protection rackets * Drug trafficking * Illegal gambling and loan-sharking * Prostitution rings * Violence and intimidation * Corruption of public officials * Money laundering * Loss of State Monopoly on Force: A key tenet of a functioning state is its monopoly on legitimate force. Legalizing the mafia would effectively grant them official power, blurring the lines between state authority and criminal authority. * Erosion of Rule of Law: It would undermine the entire legal and justice system. If criminal organizations are no longer subject to the law, then the law itself becomes meaningless. * "Mafia State" Scenario: The concept of a "mafia state" exists, where the government itself is deeply infiltrated by, or even run by, organized crime. In such a state, high government officials are integral players or leaders of criminal enterprises, and the promotion of these criminal businesses becomes an official priority. This isn't "legalization" in the formal sense, but rather a severe form of state capture and corruption where the lines between legitimate governance and criminal activity are entirely blurred.Why it's Highly Unlikely and Dangerous: * Public Outcry and Loss of Legitimacy: No democratic government could survive such a move. Public trust would collapse, leading to widespread unrest and a complete loss of governmental legitimacy. * International Condemnation: Such a move would be met with severe international condemnation, sanctions, and isolation. It would violate numerous international laws and norms against organized crime, human rights abuses, and corruption. * Increased Crime and Instability: Instead of reducing crime, it would likely empower criminal elements, leading to increased violence, lawlessness, and instability as different factions potentially vie for power. * Economic Collapse: Businesses and investors would flee a country where criminal organizations operate with legal impunity, leading to economic ruin. * No Incentive for Mafia to "Legalize": The mafia thrives on operating outside the law, exploiting illicit markets and using intimidation. Formal legalization would strip them of many of their competitive advantages and force them into legitimate business models, which they are not inherently structured or incentivized to pursue.Alternative Perspectives/Misinterpretations:Sometimes, discussions around "legalizing" certain activities that were previously domains of organized crime (e.g., cannabis, some forms of gambling) are brought up. The intent of such legalizations is usually to: * Regulate and Tax: Bring illicit markets under government control to generate revenue and ensure public safety. * Reduce Criminal Influence: Diminish the power and profits of organized crime by removing their monopoly on these goods or services. * Protect Consumers: Implement quality control and consumer protection measures that are absent in illicit markets.However, even in these cases, the criminal organizations themselves are not legalized. Their broader illegal activities remain outlawed, and law enforcement continues to pursue them. The goal is to shrink their revenue streams and undermine their power, not legitimize them.